Auracle PRO electronic gold tester, detailed information, pros and cons, hints and tips
PRO: Summary
PRO: detail
PRO: - pros
PRO: - cons
PRO: recommendations
COMPARISONS CHART
PRO: Summary
This is the top model of the Auracle brand: the PRO (professional) gold tester. For the professional dealing with several thousand pounds-worth of gold per day this is not expensive - and this model has the most features. This is definitely the model to go for if you are professional jeweller or scrap dealer.
There's also a handy 'battery meter' that keeps track of how much power remains so that, with heavy use, you're not taken by surprise by a "Low Batt" warning.
Two modes, standard and enhanced.
- Standard mode shows the nearest 'standard' carat: 8K or 10K ('K' because it's American), 14K, 18K, 22K or 24K. Also displays a bar graph showing how close it is to the standard carat.
- Enhanced mode shows the proportion of gold, though in percentage rather than parts per thousand.*
* The PRO model is for the professional: you will understand carat, percentage of gold in the alloy / parts per thousand. If this confuses you, please go for the simpler Analyser model instead, it's much simpler.
PRO: detail
- Size 145 X 105 X 30mm (5.75 X 4 X 1.25 inches)
- No acids involved, the probe contains a harmless salt solution.
- Tests gold from 8ct to 24ct (the scale is marked "K" instead of "ct" because it's American)
- Pen-probe provides up to 5000 tests.
- Simply touch pen probe to the item, result is shown in 2 or 3 seconds, very fast
- Easy one-touch calibration with a sample of 18ct - not included
- Works on battery or mains, mains adaptor (power supply included)
- As with every tester (whether you spend £100.00 or £12,000.00) it only tests the surface. This means you must file the surface with a fine needle-file (supplied with each tester) in a place where it won't show, to remove any surface plating and to make sure it is 100% clean.
- Guarantee: 1 year
It has two modes.
Standard Mode shows you the results to the nearest commonly-used carat in jewellery, with a 'graph' showing if it's slightly more or slightly less than expected.
Enhanced Mode also shows you the purity (gold content) but in percentage e.g. 37.5 for 9ct, 75.0% for 18ct etc.
PRO: - pros
- Instructions and results on one large LCD display
- One-touch calibration, no need to turn a knob (unlike the KEE tester)
- Super-fast results and no waiting between tests, you can even place several items on the test-plate at once and test them one after the other.
- Only requires one calibration sample, not two, as with the KEE tester.
- Battery indicator show percentage (and it's easy to change the battery)
- The pen-probe has a finer tip than the older (e.g. Kee) pen-probes, easier to test small items, and the pen-probe lasts longer and costs less.
PRO: - cons
- It's American, the "standard" carats (though they say K for 'Karat') start at 8ct not 9ct, so the tester will show you 8ct, 10ct, 14ct, 18ct or 22ct. A reading of 8ct or 10ct means your item is 9ct.
- The percentage (in ADVANCED mode) gives a reading to the nearest 0.1%. This is the 'readability' not the accuracy, see below.
ACCURACY ON THE PERCENTAGE READINGS
We picked a random sample of ten PRO testers from our stock and tested 9ct, 14ct, 18ct and 22ct a few times on each tester, a total of 500 tests. The display gives you a reading to the nearest 0.1%. But this is not the accuracy. Over the 500 tests and this is what we found:
- on 9ct the readings varied from 36% to 39% (should be 37.5%)
- on 14ct the readings varied from 56% and 59% (should be 58.5%)
- on 18ct the readings varied from 72% and 82% (should be 75.0%)
- on 22ct the readings varied from 79% and 95% (should be 91.6%)
This is the variation over 500 readings taken on several testers, the results won't vary this much on one sample tested on one tester. However, when you test the same item a few times, the percentage reading will vary. This is not a fault, this is the accuracy of the tester.
PRO: recommendations
If you are a professional jeweller you will understand "Carat" and will know that (when using it on standard mode) the tester reads "8ct" or "10ct", the item must be 9ct; you will understand (when using it on enhanced mode) "percentage" and "parts per thousand" and how they convert to the standard carats used in jewellery. TIP: if you don't understand this you will have no need for the enhanced mode, please keep it simple, buy the Analyzer instead.
COMPARISONS CHART
|
|
Testing range |
Display |
power |
LowBatt indicator |
Cal* |
Probe life (max) |
CE Approved |
|
Auracle ANALYZER |
8ct – 24ct |
LED (carat) LCD (prompts) |
Battery Mains |
Yes (“low batt”) |
18ct |
6000 tests |
Yes |
|
Auracle PRO |
8ct – 24ct |
LCD (various modes) |
Battery Mains |
Yes (percentage) |
18ct |
6000 tests |
Yes |
|
KEE** |
8ct – 24ct |
Analogue meter |
Battery |
No |
18ct |
3000 tests |
No |
* To keep these testers working accurately you need to calibrate them against a known sample. ** Now discontinued.
FURTHER INFORMATION
The other model is he Auracle ANALYZER. There is also a page of for specifications – go here to buy one. Not ready to buy? See a page of extended information for the ANALYZER including evaluation and reviews. Still not sure? See our comparisons page (includes the KEE tester).
Other information articles:
- Not sure what type of tester to get? See our fascinating article, Twelve methods of testing gold, silver and platinum.
- You’ve been looking at other brands and models? See Reviews of 9 electronic gold testers (and pen-probes).
- For small very fragile/valuable items such as rare coins (and also loose gemstones) see the specific gravity tester.
- Finally, do remember that acids are the most versatile and accurate for testing precious metals, see What he various testing kits do and Testing white metals.
- You have read about the limitations of electronic and need acids to test the precious metals that electronic gold testers can't cope with - see our special Q3 for use with electronic gold testers. Please note, this is only available for sale with electronic gold testers.
